Public management in municipalities: Research trends using bibliometric indicators

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.184

Keywords:

municipal public management, local public management, new public management, bibliometric analysis, public administration, local government

Abstract

Objective. This article identifies research trends in public management within municipalities through a bibliometric analysis.

Design/Methodology/Approach. This is a bibliometric study using Scopus as a source for extracting scientific literature. For this purpose, indicators of productivity, impact, and thematic analysis are used.

Results/Discussion. The analysis of scientific production in public management reveals an exponential growth since 2000, with a marked increase from 2017, reaching its maximum in 2022 (41 publications). In addition, the ten most cited papers addressing topics such as organizational capacity, leadership, new public management (NPM), and e-government were identified. These papers coincide in pointing out that the organizational context and institutional characteristics are determinants in the impact of administrative reforms. Peru is poised to emerge as a key case study in 2024, with a focus on municipal management and local development. The most recurrent themes include efficiency in public services, NPM reforms, open innovation, and the role of e-government, evidencing a multidisciplinary research approach.

Conclusions. Publication practices in municipal public management are primarily carried out in specialized journals with a distinct local character. Meanwhile, the most recent research trends on the subject range from the use of ICTs to the work strategies of governments and decision-makers, in response to complex moments in decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aiello, A., Massimi, V., Taggio, N., Borrelli, R., Laurino, V., Filippi, E., . . . Casucci, M. (2024). A Land Monitoring Service for Local Public Administrations: The IRIDE EOS4LPA Lot 3 Project. In: Borgogno Mondino, E., Zamperlin, P. (eds) Geomatics for Environmental Monitoring: From Data to Services. ASITA 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2088. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59925-5_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59925-5_8

Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. A. (2010). Capacity, leadership, and organizational performance: Testing the black box model of public management. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02158.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02158.x

Andrews, R., & Van de Walle, S. (2013). New public management and citizens' perceptions of local service efficiency, responsiveness, equity and effectiveness. Public Management Review, 15(5), 762-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.725757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.725757

Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2020). Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101(1), 3-22. doi:10.1111/padm.12874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874

Aristovnik, A., Ravšelj, D., & Murko, E. (2024). Decoding the Digital Landscape: An Empirically Validated Model for Assessing Digitalisation across Public Administration Levels. Administrative Sciences, 14(3). doi:10.3390/admsci14030041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030041

Bjärstig, T., Johansson, J., Mancheva, I., & Sandström, C. (2024). Collaboration as a policy instrument in public administration: Evidence from forest policy and governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 34(5), 538-549. doi:10.1002/eet.2099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2099

Birrell, D. (2007). The role of local government in the review of public administration in Northern Ireland: The challenges of enhancement, devolution and modernisation. Local Government Studies, 33(5), 657-675. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701627324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701627324

Birrell, D. (2008). The final outcomes of the review of public administration in Northern Ireland: Tensions and compatibility with devolution, parity and modernization. Public Administration, 86(3), 779-793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00725.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00725.x

Bisogno, M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Rossi, F. M., & Peña-Miguel, N. (2023). Sustainable development goals in public administrations: Enabling conditions in local governments. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(4), 1223-1242. doi:10.1177/00208523221146458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221146458

Boin, A., & Lodge, M. (2021). Responding to the COVID-19 crisis: A new role for the state? Public Administration Review, 81(4), 603-615. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13355

Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2016). Public management and governance. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693279

Caramia, S., Ruggiero, P., & Mussari, R. (2024). Auditors’ Sensemaking During Crises: The Case of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italian Local Public Administrations. Abacus. doi:10.1111/abac.12332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12332

Castellini, M., Ferrario, C., & Riso, V. (2024). New public management evolving agenda: risk management in Italian municipalities. International Journal of Public Sector Management. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-06-2023-0210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2023-0210

Criado, J. I., & Villodre, J. (2023). Exploring citizens attitudes towards social media use by public administrations: the case of Spanish local governments. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DG-O '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598486

Dacombe, R., & Wojciechowska, M. (2024). Social Choice and Citizen Participation: Bringing Democratic Theory to Public Administration. Political Studies Review, 22(4), 722-739. doi:10.1177/14789299231203657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299231203657

Falanga, R. (2024). Participatory processes and civil servants' perceptions of change in public administration. A study from Lisbon. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 14(2), 212-231. doi:10.1504/IJPSPM.2024.140547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2024.140547

Feller, J., Finnegan, P., & Nilsson, O. (2011). Open innovation and public administration: Transformational typologies and business model impacts. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 358-374. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.65

Gendron, Y., Cooper, D. J., & Townley, B. (2001). In the name of accountability: State auditing, independence and new public management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 278-310. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005518

Gomes, R. C., & de Azevedo, C. B. (2024). Balanced Scorecard: A literature review to trace its trajectory in the public administration domain. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(8), 502–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2376053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2376053

Halligan, J. (2015). Public administration in the Australian Journal of Political Science: A review. Australian Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2015.1114555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2015.1114555

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

James, O., & John, P. (2007). Public management at the ballot box: Performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul020

Kostyreva, D. A., Kretova, A. Y., & Likhtenshtein, B. M. (2023). Digitalisation as a tool of public administration (using the example of Tyumen). Electronic Government, 19(6), 747-759. doi:10.1504/EG.2023.134024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2023.134024

Kuhlmann, S., & Marienfeldt, J. (2023). Comparing local government systems and reforms in Europe: From New Public Management to Digital Era Governance? Handbook on Local and Regional Governance (pp. 313-329). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371200.00033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371200.00033

Leach, R., & Barnett, N. (1997). The new public management and the local government review. Local Government Studies, 23(3), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003939708433875

Leach, R., & Barnett, N. (2013). The new public management and the local government review. In Local government reorganisation: The review and its aftermath (pp. 39-55). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003939708433875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003939708433875

Lee, S. (1986). Judicial review of public administration. Public Money, 6(3), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540968609387396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540968609387396

Martins, M., Costa, C. S., & Costa, R. (2023). Tourism Versus Local Public Administration: Research Trends through Bibliometric Analysis. In: Carvalho, J.V., Abreu, A., Liberato, P., Peña, A. (eds) Advances in Tourism, Technology and Systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 345. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0337-5_25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0337-5_25

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Montecinos, E., & Contreras, P. (2019). Citizenship participation in public management: A review of the current state. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 24(86), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.37960/revista.v24i86.23767

Moretti, E., & Stamponi, E. (2023). The Renewable Energy Communities in Italy and the Role of Public Administrations: The Experience of the Municipality of Assisi between Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(15). doi:10.3390/su151511869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511869

Nasi, G., Choi, H., Cucciniello, M., & Christensen, R. K. (2023). A systematic literature review of city competitiveness: A 30-year assessment and future agenda for public administration. Public Management Review, 25(8), 1562-1586. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2029550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2029550

O'Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2015). Public management, context, and performance: In quest of a more general theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu011

Perez-Lopez, G., Prior, D., & Zafra-Gómez, J. L. (2015). Rethinking new public management delivery forms and efficiency: Long-term effects in Spanish local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1157-1183. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu088

Profiroiu, A. G., & Nastacă, C. C. (2023). An Assessment of Institutional Resilience Capacity of the Local Public Administration: Evidence from Romania. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 23(4), 507-528. doi:10.31297/hkju.23.4.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.23.4.6

Schäfer, F. S., Hirsch, B., & Nitzl, C. (2023). The effects of public service motivation, risk propensity and risk perception on defensive decision-making in public administrations. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 35(2), 244-263. doi:10.1108/JPBAFM-04-2022-0060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-04-2022-0060

Torres, L., Pina, V., & Royo, S. (2005). E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms? Online Information Review, 29(5), 531-553. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520510628918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520510628918

Vigoda, E. (2000). Internal politics in public administration systems: An empirical examination of its relationship with job congruence, organizational citizenship behavior, and in-role performance. Public Personnel Management, 29(2), 185-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600002900203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600002900203

Walker, R. M., & Boyne, G. A. (2006). Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the U.K. Labour government's public service improvement strategy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(2), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20177

Downloads

Published

2025-07-23

How to Cite

Alvarez Ushiñahua , W. A. (2025). Public management in municipalities: Research trends using bibliometric indicators. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 5(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.184

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication

Section

Original article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Washinton Americo Alvarez Ushiñahua

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0, which permits copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format, adapting, transforming, and building upon the material as long as the license terms are followed.