Modelo SECI de gestión del conocimiento: Un análisis temático con énfasis en las organizaciones agrícolas

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.133

Palavras-chave:

knowledge management

Resumo

Objectivo: O objectivo desta investigação é identificar as tendências temáticas na gestão do conhecimento através do modelo de Socialização, Exteriorização, Combinação e Internalização (SECI) de Nonaka e Tekeuchi no campo da agricultura. Esta investigação contribui para fornecer um modelo conceptual e teórico do modelo SECI no contexto dos negócios agrícolas.
Design/Metodologia/Abordagem. Foi realizada uma análise bibliométrica onde foram considerados 2.206 documentos indexados na base de dados Scopus entre 1982 e 2024. A análise foi realizada utilizando palavras-chave dos autores para identificar tendências temáticas e coocorrências.
Resultados/Discussão. Foram identificados núcleos temáticos relacionados com a inovação e a inovação aberta. Entre os principais resultados, observa-se um notável boom na utilização do modelo nos últimos anos. No sector agrícola, a criação e transferência de conhecimento representa uma parte do modelo que tem sido cada vez mais utilizado. Destaca-se a importância de compreender e aproveitar eficazmente o modelo para promover a inovação e o desenvolvimento sustentável na agricultura, com a proposta de um modelo exploratório não linear que foca a transformação do conhecimento na sua fonte.
Palavras-chave: setor agrícola; gestão do conhecimento; modelo SECI; bibliometria; revisão da literatura; análise de co-moeda

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Ahmadani, A. A. K., Putra, S. A., & Lubis, M. (2023). Comparative Study of Knowledge Management Framework. Proceedings - 2023 3rd International Conference on Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Intelligent System: Responsible Technology for Sustainable Humanity, ICE3IS 2023, 276 – 281. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE3IS59323.2023.10335211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE3IS59323.2023.10335211

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bratianu, C., & Bejinaru, R. (2020). Knowledge dynamics: a thermodynamics approach. Kybernetes, 49(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2019-0122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2019-0122

Breslin, D., & Bailey, K. (2020). Expanding the Conversation through ‘Debate Essays’ and ‘Review Methodology’ Papers. International Journal of Management Reviews 22 (3), 219–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12234

Chatti, M. A., Klamma, R., Jarke, M., & Naeve, A. (2007). The web 2.0 driven SECI model-based learning process. Proceedings - The 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2007, 780–782. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2007.256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2007.256

Debmalya, M., Weng Marc, L., Satish, K., & Naveen, D. (2022). Debmalya Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Flores Torres, C. L., Olvera-Vargas, L. A., Sánchez Gómez, J., & Contreras-Medina, D. I. (2021). Discovering innovation opportunities based on SECI model: reconfiguring knowledge dynamics of the agricultural artisan production of agave-mezcal, using emerging technologies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0078

Gaviria-Marín, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006

Hamid, Z. A., Chandiram, S. G., Ancelot, R., & Fontaine, H. (2023). Knowledge Creation Among Managers and Supervisors in Palm oil Estates in Malaysia. Proceedings - the 24th European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM 2023.

Hong, J. F. L. (2012). Glocalizing Nonaka’s knowledge creation model: Issues and challenges. Management Learning, 43(2), 199 – 215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611428853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611428853

Isoe, Y., & Nakatani, Y. (2011). Agricultural knowledge transfer based on experience from failures. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference e-Democracy, Equity and Social Justice 2011, Part of the IADIS, MCCSIS 2011, 263 – 266.

Jayanti, D. S., Arif, S. S., Susanto, S., & Sutiarso, L. (2021). Implementation of land and water controlling: Case study in Sriharjo Village, Bantul District, Yogyakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 922(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/922/1/012030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/922/1/012030

Khadir-Poggi, Y. (2018, September). A Critical Perspective on the Nonakian Paradigm. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 384-XXI). Academic Conferences International Limited.

Li, M., & Gao, F. (2003). Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: A critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 6 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310492903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310492903

León-Torres, D. A., & Alvarado-Borrego, A. (2020). Prácticas en gestión del conocimiento de la empresa familiar agropecuaria. Ra Ximhai, 16 (5), 99-124

Magnier-Watanabe, R., & Benton, C. (2013). Enablers of knowledge management across borders: A structural approach. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877013500120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877013500120

Martínez-Martínez, A., Cazzaniga, F., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Bolisani, E., & Wensley, A. (2018). Overcoming environmental barriers through KM practices. In S. E., B. E., & D. M. E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM. Vol. 1, 521 – 529.

Nonaka, I., Byosiere, P., Borucki, C. C., & Konno, N. (1994). Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: a First Comprehesive Test. International Business, 3(4), 337–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-5931(94)90027-2

Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5 – 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6

Nonaka, & Takeuchi. (1995). The Knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation: I. Nonaka & H. Takeuchi (p. 284). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001

Seghroucheni, O. Z., Al Achhab, M., & Lazaar, M. (2023). Systematic Review on the Conversion of Tacit Knowledge. In 2023 7th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt) (pp. 123-128). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CiSt56084.2023.10409884

Souma, T., & Kminami, L. (2011). Knowledge management in agricultural succession. Studies in Regional Science, 41(4), 943 – 955. https://doi.org/10.2457/srs.41.943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2457/srs.41.943

Susanto, J., Permata, J., Sensuse, D. I., & Elisabeth, D. (2021). Systematic Literature Review: Knowledge Management Model in Private Organizations. Proceedings - 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering: The Effects of the Digital World After Pandemic (EDWAP), IC2SE 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2SE52832.2021.9791468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2SE52832.2021.9791468

Tee, M. Y., & Lee, S. S. (2012). Advancing understanding using Nonaka’s model of knowledge creation and problem-based learning. 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings, 2, 467 – 468.

Tumwebaze, R. P., Walsh, J., & Lannon, J. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review of Agriculture Knowledge Management in KM and non-KM Journals. European Conference on Knowledge Management, Vol. 23 (2), 1195-1201. https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.23.2.313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.23.2.313

Yusoff, M. Z., Saadon, M. S. I., Salleh, N. H., Kamaron, T., & Ahmad, H. (2018). Literature Review on Determinants Affecting Knowledge Sharing. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 860-866.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-09-20

Como Citar

López-Meza, E., Terán-Bustamante, A., & Leyva-Hernández, S. N. (2024). Modelo SECI de gestión del conocimiento: Un análisis temático con énfasis en las organizaciones agrícolas. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.133

Edição

Vol. 4 N.º 2 (2024): Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication

Secção

Artigo original

Licença

Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Evelia López-Meza, Antonia Terán-Bustamante; Sandra Nelly Leyva-Hernández

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0, which permits copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format, adapting, transforming, and building upon the material as long as the license terms are followed.