An analysis of cooperation networks related to research projects between universities in the Chungcheong region in Korea: Suggestions for strengthening university networks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.84

Keywords:

Inter-university cooperation network, joint research, Chungcheong region, network analysis method

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to obtain information regarding how 54 universities in the Chungcheong region of Korea are conducting joint research among themselves. More specifically, the study aims to understand the network characteristics and main patterns according to which universities in the Chungcheong region are conducting joint research, and to obtain the information necessary to utilize the network structure between universities as a strategy for future regional development.

Design/Meghodology/Appraoch:  For this purpose, we investigated the number of joint research projects conducted among these 54 universities in 2022, thereby obtaining the most up-to-date information possible. Network analysis was performed based on the surveyed data.

Result/Discussion:  The research results show that  a total of five clusters exist in the Chungcheong area. The universities that play a central role include KAIST, Chungnam National University, Chungbuk National University, Kongju University and Korea National University of Transportation.

Conclusions:  Because these universities constitute important bases in the region and have close links with neighbouring universities, they are expected to play an important role in future regional development.

Originality/Value: One of the academic implications of this study is that it applied social network analysis methods to research-related partnerships between universities in the Chungcheong region to identify universities that play an important key role.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appio, F. P., Lima, M. & Paroutis, S. (2019). Understanding smart cities: innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 142(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018

Bejinaru, R. (2022). Cluster analysis of risks and vulnerabilities for environment sustainable management. Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 7(2), 35–48. http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe155

Bejinaru, R. & Baesu, C. (2017). Connecting approaches of sustainable development and organizational change in business companies. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, 17(26), 87–94. http://www.annals.seap.usv.ro/index.php/annals/article/view/1025/897.

Bejinaru, R., Hapenciuc, C. V., Condratov, I. & Stanciu, P. (2018). The university role in developing the human capital for a sustainable bioeconomy. Amfiteatru Economic, 20(49), 583–98. http://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2018/49/583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2018/49/583

Bejinaru, R., Neamţu, D. M., Condratov, I., Stanciu, P. & Hapenciuc, C. V. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of university agenda for developing students’ entrepreneurial behaviour. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 1,317–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2086597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2086597

Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S. & Galati, F. (2021). The past, present and future of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1,130–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0296

Birkner, Z., Máhr, T. & Berkes, N. R. (2017). Changes in responsibilities and tasks of universities in regional innovation ecosystems. Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy, 63(2), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/ngoe-2017-0008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngoe-2017-0008

Bratianu, C. (2002). Management Strategic. Universitaria Craiova.

Bratianu, C. (2007). An integrated perspective on the organizational intellectual capital. Review of Management and Economical Engineering, 6(5), 107–12.

Bratianu, C. (2018). A holistic approach to knowledge risk. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 6(4), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.25019/MDKE/6.4.06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25019/MDKE/6.4.06

Bratianu, C., Prelipcean, G. & Bejinaru, R. (2020). Exploring the latent variables, which 264 | Bianca Roxana SALAGEANU SOLDAN, Ruxandra BEJINARU Investigating Sustainable Business Ecosystems: A Cluster Analysis support SMEs to become learning organizations. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 15(2), 154–71. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0010

Burciu, A., Kicsi, R., Danileț, A.M., Bostan, I. & Condratov, I. (2023). The nexus between innovation and internationalization. Evidence from a micro-level survey of the Romanian ICT business sector. Eastern European Economics, 61(2), 131–51. http://doi.org./10.1080/00128775.2022.2152051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2022.2152051

Cai, Y., Ma, J. & Chen, Q. (2020). Higher education in innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 12, 4, 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114376

Campos, D. A., Gómez-García, R., Vilas-Boas, A. A., Madureira, A. R. & Pintado, M. M. (2020). Management of fruit industrial by-products – a case study on circular economy approach. Molecules, 25, 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020320

Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Martínez Caro, E., Martínez-Martínez, A., Aledo-Ruiz, M. D. & Martínez-Conesa, E. (2021). Capacities, competences and capabilities as knowledge structures to build relational capital. Kybernetes, 50(5), 1, 303–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2020-0115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2020-0115

Cepeda‐Carrion, G., Cegarra‐Navarro, J. G. & Jimenez‐Jimenez, D. (2012). The effect of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: context and information systems capability as catalysts. British Journal of Management, 23(1), 110–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00725.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00725.x

Cho, D. S., Ryan, P. & Buciuni, G. (2022). Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: a research pathway. Small Bus Econ, 58, 1, 865–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00487-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00487-4

Choi, M. (2020). Ten Social Dimensions of Conversations and Relationships. WWW ‘20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380224

Choi, M. (2023). A Computational Analysis on the Role of Social Relationships in Online Communication and Information Diffusion. Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master’s https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/8203.

Choi, M., Jurgens, D. & Romero, D. M. (2023). Analysing the Engagement of Social Relationships during Life Event Shocks in Social Media. Vol. 17 (2023): Proceedings of the Seventeenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22134

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J. & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: crossing the chasm between, knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1, 164–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014

Cobben, D., Ooms, W., Roijakkers, N. & Radziwon, A. (2022). Ecosystem types: a systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, 142, 138–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046

Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102, 642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Ellegaard, O. & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105, 1, 809–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

Faber, A., Riemhofer, M., Rehm, S.-V. & Bondel, G. (2019, August 15–17). A systematic mapping study on business ecosystem types [paper presentation]. 25th Americas Conference, ‘Information Systems’, Cancun, Mexico. https://web.archive.org/web/20200709183750id_/https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1437&context=amcis2019.

Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C. & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007

Graça, P. & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2017). Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems – literature review and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 237–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.012

Kolomytseva, O. & Pavlovska, A. (2020). The role of universities in the national innovation system. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(1), 51–8. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-51-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-51-58

Markkula, M. & Kune, H. (2015). Making smart regions smarter: smart specialization and the role of universities in regional innovation ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10), 7–15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/932

Piscicelli, L. (2023). The sustainability impact of a digital circular economy. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 61, 101, 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101251

Prokop, D. (2022). The composition of university entrepreneurial ecosystems and academic entrepreneurship: a UK study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 19(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877022500201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877022500201

Saura, J. R., Palacios-Marqués, D. & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2023). Exploring the boundaries of open innovation: evidence from social media mining. Technovation, 119, 102 ,447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102447

Scaringella, L. & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: old wine in new bottles?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136(1), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023

Sestino, A., Prete, M. I., Piper, L. & Guido, G. (2020). Internet of things and big data as enablers for business digitalization strategies. Technovation, 98, 102, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102173

Thomas, E., Faccin, K. & Terje Asheim, B. (2021). Universities as orchestrators of the development of regional innovation ecosystems in emerging economies. Growth and Change, 52, 770–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12442

Downloads

Published

2023-11-28

How to Cite

Choi, Y.-C., & Jang, J.-H. (2023). An analysis of cooperation networks related to research projects between universities in the Chungcheong region in Korea: Suggestions for strengthening university networks. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.84