Family and marital status: A bibliometric analysis based on research indexed in Web of Science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.323

Keywords:

family studies, marital status, bibliometric analysis, scientific collaboration, keyword co-occurrence, Web of Science

Abstract

Objective. A comprehensive analysis of the scientific production on family and marital status, as indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 2001 to 2024, was conducted. This analysis aimed to identify patterns of international and institutional collaboration, as well as the field’s predominant thematic structures.

Design/Methodology/Approach. A bibliometric approach was applied to a dataset of 8,457 articles classified under the Family Studies category in the Web of Science Core Collection. To this end, directed networks of country collaboration, institutional collaboration, and keyword co-occurrence were constructed and analyzed using Gephi. The analysis focused on weighted degree, betweenness centrality, and harmonic closeness centrality, while thematic communities were identified through modularity analysis.

Results/Discussion. The findings indicated a field characterized by extensive integration within a hierarchical structure. International and institutional collaboration networks exhibited a pronounced centralization around universities and countries in the Global North, particularly the United States. The thematic structure was organized around a stable relational and psychosocial core centered on family, parenting, marriage, and mental health, alongside specialized communities addressing family violence, inequality, gender and sexual diversity, professional intervention, and academic training.

Conclusions. The study of family and marital status is a mature and multidimensional field. While the phenomenon of collaboration is becoming increasingly transnational, the distribution of scientific visibility and agenda-setting remains uneven.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.01.002

Akpan, I. J. (2020). Bibliometric analysis and visualization of the consequences of marital union dissolution on parents and children. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3698447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3698447

Akpan, I. J., & Ezeume, I. C. (2022). Four decades bibliometric analysis, science mapping, and visualization of the consequences of marital union dissolution on parents and children. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 63(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2021.1993009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2021.1993009

Bayer, A. E. (1982). A bibliometric analysis of marriage and family literature. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(3), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/351577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/351577

Cassinat, J. R., Whiteman, S. D., Serang, S., Dotterer, A. M., Mustillo, S. A., Maggs, J. L., & Kelly, B. C. (2021). Changes in family chaos and family relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 57(10), 1597–1610. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001217

Chung, H. (1990). Research on the marital relationship: A critical review. Family Science Review, 3(1), 41–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26536/FSR.1990.03.01.05

Islam, M. A., Khatun, M. B., & Rahman, M. H. (2025). Visualization of Scopus and WOS data (2000–2024) on forced, child, and contract marriage: A bibliometric analysis. SN Social Sciences, 5(9), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01180-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01180-z

Lou, Y.-C., & Lin, H.-F. (2012). Estimate of global research trends and performance in family therapy in Social Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 90(3), 807–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0549-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0549-9

Lungeanu, A., Huang, Y., & Contractor, N. S. (2014). Understanding the assembly of interdisciplinary teams and its impact on performance. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.006

Martinho, V. J. P. D. (2021). Insights into circular economy indicators: Emphasizing dimensions of sustainability. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 10, Article 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100119

Robles, E. L., & Sarcon, L. J. (2023). The mediating effect of work commitment on the relationship between family relations and marital satisfaction of social workers. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i8.4934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i8.4934

Usmonova, N. (2025). Uzbek marital and family relations and their socio-psychological and ethnopsychological characteristics as interpreted by Eastern thinkers. Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 1(2), 622–626.

Viana, L. S., & Teixeira, K. M. D. (2021). Family communication and family relations: A bibliometric and network analysis. World Journal of Research and Review, 12(4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.31871/wjrr.12.4.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31871/WJRR.12.4.7

Yan, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, C., Li, J., Gao, J., & Geng, Y. (2025). Evolving trends in work-family balance research: A bibliometric perspective. Medicine, 104(46), Article e45851. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000045851

Downloads

Published

2026-01-14

How to Cite

Baigabylov, N., Mussabayeva, A., Kudabekov, M., Maslov, K., & Turlybekova, A. (2026). Family and marital status: A bibliometric analysis based on research indexed in Web of Science. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.323

Issue

Section

Original article

Funding data