Retractions in business, management, and accounting journals: Analysis of documents published in Scopus between 2000 and 2023

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.250

Keywords:

retraction, research ethics, Retraction Watch database, business, management, and accounting

Abstract

Objective. This study analyzed the retraction of scientific articles in business, management, and accounting between 2000 and 2023.

Methodology. The Retraction Watch database was utilized as a source, and 365 formally retracted documents were selected for analysis. A comprehensive examination of the variables was conducted, encompassing the publication and retraction dates, author affiliation, country of publication, rationale for retraction, and journal quartile.

Results. The findings indicated a persistent increase in retractions, with substantial spikes commencing in 2012, concomitant with enhanced ethical and methodological oversight. China and the United States led in absolute numbers of retractions; however, some countries exhibited high proportions relative to their total output. The analysis of co-authorships revealed clusters of researchers with multiple retractions, evidencing specific patterns of misconduct. The predominant cause of retraction was scientific misconduct (72.6%), surpassing unintentional and editorial errors. The prevalence of retracted articles in high-impact journals (Q1 and Q2) was also notable, indicating that malpractice transcended the quality of the publication.

Conclusions. The study’s findings indicated that substandard academic practices were not confined to the academic sphere. Rather, their ramifications could propagate beyond this domain, exerting influence on economic, social, and political decision-making processes. This evidence underscored the necessity of fortifying academic integrity and transparency within the review and publication processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alrawadieh, Z. (2018). Publishing in predatory tourism and hospitality journals: Mapping the academic market and identifying response strategies. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358418800121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358418800121

Alrawadieh, Z., & Zareer, A. (2019). Exploring retraction in tourism and hospitality journals. European Journal of Tourism Research, 22, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v22i.372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v22i.372

Angadi, P. V., & Kaur, H. (2020). Research integrity at risk: predatory journals are a growing threat. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 23(2), 113–116.

Bakker, C., & Riegelman, A. (2018). Retracted publications in mental health literature: Discovery across bibliographic platforms. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 6(1), Article eP2199. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2199

Bakker, C. J., Reardon, E. E., Brown, S. J., Theis-Mahon, N., Schroter, S., Bouter, L., & Zeegers, M. P. (2024). Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 173, Article 111427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111427

Banks, G., O’Boyle, E., Pollack, J., White, C., Batchelor, J., Whelpy, C., Abston, K., Bennett, A., & Adkins, C. (2016). Questions about questionable research practices in the field of management: A guest commentary. Journal of Management, 42(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315619011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315619011

Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2018). Temporal characteristics of retracted articles. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1771–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2802-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2802-y

Basumatary, B., Sinha, M., Kumar, V., & Verman, M. (2025). Retractions in Indian business research: A closer look at trends, reasons, and impacts of retracted articles. Journal of Library and Information Technology, 45(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.20357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.20357

Bordino, M., Ravizzotti, E., & Vercelli, S. (2020). Retracted articles in rehabilitation: Just the tip of the iceberg? A bibliometric analysis. Archives of Physiotherapy, 10, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-020-00092-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-020-00092-w

Butler, N., Delaney, H., & Spoelstra, S. (2017). The gray zone: Questionable research practices in the business school. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0201

Call, C. M., Michalakes, P. C., Lachance, A. D., Zink, T. M., & McGrory, B. J. (2024). A systematic review of retracted publications in clinical orthopaedic research. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 39(12), 3107–3113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.085

Campos-Varela, I., & Ruano-Raviña, A. (2019). Misconduct is the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors. Gaceta Sanitaria, 33(4), 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009

Chapman, D. W., & Lindner, S. (2014). Degrees of integrity: The threat of corruption in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927854

Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. (2018). Transparency, reproducibility, and the credibility of economics research. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3), 920–980.https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171350

Cox, A., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2018). Retraction statements and research malpractice in economics. Research Policy, 47(5), 924–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.016

Craig, R., Cox, A., Tourish, D., & Thorpe, A. (2020). Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is to be done? Research Policy, 49(4), Article 103930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103930

Dal-Ré, R., & Ayuso, C. (2020). For how long and with what relevance do retracted genetics articles due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature? Accountability in Research, 28(5), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1835479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1835479

Decullier, E., & Maisonneuve, H. (2023). Retraction according to gender: A descriptive study. Accountability in Research, 30(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1988576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1988576

Decullier, E., Samson, G., & Huot, L. (2012). Rétractations pour erreur et pour fraude [Retractions due to errors and frauds]. Presse Medicale, 41(9), 847–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2012.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2012.05.006

Elango, B., Kozak, M., & Rajendran, P. (2019). Analysis of retractions in Indian science. Scientometrics, 119, 1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03079-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03079-y

Fanelli, D. (2013). Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Medicine, 10(12), Article e1001563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563

Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109

Foo, J. Y. A. (2011). A retrospective analysis of the trend of retracted publications in the field of biomedical and life sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9212-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9212-8

Freijedo-Fariñas, F., Ruano-Ravina, A., Pérez-Ríos, M., Ross, J., & Candal-Pedreira, C. (2024). Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: Characterization and trends in the last 20 years. Scientometrics, 129(5), 2867–2882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04992-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04992-7

Gholampour, B., Gholampour, S., Noruzi, A., Arsenault, C., Haertlé, T., & Saboury, A. (2022). Retracted articles in oncology in the last three decades: Frequency, reasons, and themes. Scientometrics, 127, 1841–1865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04305-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04305-w

Ghorbi, A., Fazeli-Varzaneh, M., Ghaderi-Azad, E., Ausloos, M., & Kozak, M. (2021). Retracted papers by Iranian authors: Causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations. Scientometrics, 126, 7351–7371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04104-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04104-9

Grieneisen, M. L., & Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE, 7(10), Article e44118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118

He, T. (2013). Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010. Scientometrics, 96(2), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0906-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0906-3

Johal, J., Ward, R., Gielecki, J., Walocha, J., Natsis, K., Tubbs, R. S., & Loukas, M. (2017). Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research. Clinical Anatomy, 30(6), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22899

Katavić, V. (2014). Retractions of scientific publications: Responsibility and accountability. Biochemia Medica (Zagreb), 24(2), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.024

Khan, H., Gasparyan, A. Y., & Gupta, L. (2021). Lessons learned from publicizing and retracting an erroneous hypothesis on the mumps, measles, rubella (MMR) vaccination with unethical implications. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 36(19), Article e126. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e126

Kocyigit, B. F., & Akyol, A. (2022). Analysis of retracted publications in the biomedical literature from Turkey. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(18), Article e142. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e142

Koo, M., & Lin, S.-C. (2024). Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science. Heliyon, 10(20), Article e38620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38620

Lei, F., Du, L., Dong, M., & Liu, X. (2024). Global retractions due to randomly generated content: Characterization and trends. Scientometrics, 129, 7943–7958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05172-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05172-3

Lei, L., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Lack of improvement in scientific integrity: An analysis of WoS retractions by Chinese researchers (1997–2016). Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9962-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9962-7

Lewis, B. R., Duchac, J. E., & Beets, S. D. (2011). An academic publisher’s response to plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0827-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0827-8

Li, M. H., Chen, F. Y., Tong, S. C., Yang, L., & Shen, Z. S. (2024). Amend: An integrated platform of retracted papers and concerned papers. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(2), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024- 0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0012

Little, M., Lipworth, W., & Kerridge, I. (2022). An archeology of corruption in medicine. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 19(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-022-10178-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-022-10178-8

Marco-Cuenca, G., Salvador-Oliván, J., & Arquero-Avilés, R. (2019). Ética en la publicación científica biomédica. Revisión de las publicaciones retractadas en España. El profesional de la información, 28(2), Article e280222. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.22

Martínez, E., & Zahn, C. (2025). Retraction of scientific literature: Analyzing the reasons for retractions across different areas of knowledge in Latin America. Data and Metadata, 4(638). https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025638

Montgomery, K. (2022). Response-corruption, trust, and professional regulation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 19(1), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10149-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10149-5

Mousavi, T., & Abdollahi, M. (2020). A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 28(1), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-020-00332-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-020-00332-1

Pinho-Gomes, A. C., Hockham, C., & Woodward, M. (2023). Women’s representation as authors of retracted papers in the biomedical sciences. PLoS ONE, 18(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284403

Resnik, D. B., Rasmussen, L. M., & Kissling, G. E. (2015). An international study of research misconduct policies. Accountability in Research, 22(5), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.958218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.958218

Ribeiro, M. D., Kalichman, M., & Vasconcelos, S. M. R. (2022). Retractions and rewards in science: An open question for reviewers and funders. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.31.494225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.31.494225

Rubbo, P., Helmann, C., Santos, C., & Pilatti, L. (2017). Retractions in the engineering field: A study on the Web of Science database. Ethics and Behavior, 29(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1390667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1390667

Sebo, P., Schwarz, J., Achtari, M., & Clair, C. (2023). Women are underrepresented among authors of retracted publications: Retrospective study of 134 medical journals. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/48529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/48529

Sebo, P., & Sebo, M. (2025a). Assessing database accuracy for article retractions: A preliminary study comparing Retraction Watch database, PubMed, and Web of Science. Accountability in Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2465621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2465621

Sebo, P., & Sebo, M. (2025b). Geographical disparities in research misconduct: Analyzing retraction patterns by country. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, Article e65775. https://doi.org/10.2196/65775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/65775

Sharma, K. (2021). Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020. Scientometrics, 126, 8363–8374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04125-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04125-4

Sharma, P., Sharma, B., Reza, A., Inampudi, K. K., & Dhamija, R. K. (2023). A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: Reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 597. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02095-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02095-x

Sox, H. C., & Rennie, D. (2006). Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(8), 609–613. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00123

Stavale, R., Ferreira, G. I., Galvão, J. A. M., Zicker, F., Novaes, M. R. C. G., Oliveira, C. M., & Guilhem, D. (2019). Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions. PLoS One, 14(4), Article e0214272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214272

Steen, R. G., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2013). Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoS One, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/0d28db18-e117-4804-b1bc-e2da285103ac

Tang, L., Hu, G. Y., Sui, Y., Yang, Y. H., & Cao, C. (2020). Retraction: The “other face” of research collaboration? Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1681–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00209-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00209-1

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2022). A synthesis of the formats for correcting erroneous and fraudulent academic literature, and associated challenges. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 53, 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-022-09607-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-022-09607-4

Toma, C., Padureanu, L., & Toma, B. (2022). Correction of the scientific production: Publisher performance evaluation using a dataset of 4844 PubMed retractions. Publications, 10(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020018

Tourish, D., & Craig, R. (2020). Research misconduct in business and management studies: Causes, consequences, and possible remedies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618792621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618792621

Van Noorden, R. (2023). More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023—A new record. Nature, 624(7992), 479–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8

Were, E., Kiplagat, J., Kaguiri, E., Nyangena, D. M., & Mwaka, E. S. (2023). Institutional capacity to prevent and manage research misconduct: Perspectives from Kenyan research regulators. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00132-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00132-6

Yuan, Z. H., & Liu, Y. (2023). Research misconduct in hospitals is spreading: A bibliometric analysis of retracted papers from Chinese university-affiliated hospitals. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(4), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0022

Downloads

Published

2025-07-27

How to Cite

Zahn Muñoz, C., Alarcón-Henríquez, N., Viancos-González, P., & Martínez Rojas, E. (2025). Retractions in business, management, and accounting journals: Analysis of documents published in Scopus between 2000 and 2023. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 5(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.250

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication

Section

Original article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Cristian Zahn Muñoz, Nancy Alarcón-Henríquez, Patricio Viancos-González, Ezequiel Martínez-Rojas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0, which permits copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format, adapting, transforming, and building upon the material as long as the license terms are followed.