Why deemed and private universities are lagging in publishing their research online with India’s national repository?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.233

Keywords:

theses repository, universities, dissemination of research, online publication of research

Abstract

Objective. The Indian national online PhD theses repository, “Shodhganga,” published approximately 584,000 theses. The top 10 universities that contributed approximately 25% of the total were all central and state universities. In contrast, the number of theses contributed by deemed and private universities was comparatively limited. This study explored the factors contributing to the limited contributions from deemed and private universities and proposed strategies to enhance their engagement in research dissemination.

Design/Methodology/Approach. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, 15 research experts from deemed and private universities in India were interviewed. A qualitative data analysis methodology was employed. Thematic analysis was employed to extract common views.

Results/Discussion. The expert group posited that faculty members from deemed and private universities exhibited a greater propensity for academic social networks such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu. The national repository should provide feedback features analogous to those offered by ResearchGate and Academia.edu. It was anticipated that a substantial online research publication would be made available to the public if the deemed and private universities enhanced their contributions.

Conclusions. The Indian national repository, Shodhganga, achieved notable growth in its publication of PhD theses, with a total of 584,000 records currently available. However, the repository’s development revealed some concerns regarding the inclusivity of institutional representation. The majority of contributions originated from government-owned state and central universities, suggesting an imbalance in institutional engagement. Deemed and private universities contributed a comparatively smaller share of theses to the repository. This study made a novel contribution to the field by highlighting problems of national repositories that may see uneven growth. To ensure that the research shared was representative of all the stakeholders, they ought to work toward inclusive growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., & Acosta, T. (2017). Accessibility of portable document format in education repositories. In Proceedings of the 2017 9th international conference on education technology and computers (pp. 239–242). https://doi.org/10.1145/3175536.3175574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3175536.3175574

Adam, U. A., & Kaur, K. (2022). Institutional repositories in Africa: Regaining direction. Information Development, 38(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211015429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211015429

Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5

Aljohani, M., & Blustein, J. (2015). Heuristic evaluation of university institutional repositories based on DSpace. In International conference of design, user experience, and usability (pp. 119–130). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20889-3_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20889-3_12

Altman, M. (2004). Statistical significance, path dependency, and the culture of journal publication. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(5), 651–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.037

Armbruster, C., & Romary, L. (2010). Comparing repository types: Challenges and barriers for subject-based repositories, research repositories, national repository systems and institutional repositories in serving scholarly communication. International Journal of Digital Library Systems (IJDLS), 1(4), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdls.2010100104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jdls.2010100104

Arthur, P. (2020). Nikos Koutras: Building equitable access to knowledge through open access repositories. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36, 681–683. https://doi.org/10.1017/s12109-020-09754-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09754-w

Ashcraft, L. E., Quinn, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2020). Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3

Balogun, T., & Kalusopa, T. (2022). Web archiving of indigenous knowledge systems in South Africa. Information Development, 38(4), 658–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211005522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211005522

Bashir, S., Gul, S., Bashir, S., Nisa, N. T., & Ganaie, S. A. (2022). Evolution of institutional repositories: Managing institutional research output to remove the gap of academic elitism. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(3), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211009592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211009592

Bell, S., Fried Foster, N., & Gibbons, S. (2005). Reference librarians and the success of institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320510611311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320510611311

Bennett, S. (2003). Libraries designed for learning (p. 11). Council on Library and Information Resources.

Chan, L., & Costa, S. (2005). Participation in the global knowledge commons: Challenges and opportunities for research dissemination in developing countries. New Library World, 106(3/4), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800510587354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800510587354

Cragin, M. H., Palmer, C. L., Carlson, J. R., & Witt, M. (2010). Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926), 4023–4038. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0165

Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., & White, S. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(S1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.518851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.518851

Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].

De Hoyos, M., & Barnes, S., (2012). Analysing interview data. Warwick Institute for Employment Research.

de Mutiis, A., & Kitchen, S. (2016). African digital research repositories: Survey report. Africa Bibliography, 2015, vii–xxv. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266673116000027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266673116000027

Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1319–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6

Ejikeme, A. N., & Ezema, I. J. (2019). The potentials of open access initiative and the development of institutional repositories in Nigeria: Implications for scholarly communication. Publishing Research Quarterly, 35, 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-09626-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-09626-4

Garoufallou, E., Banos, V., & Koulouris, A. (2013). Solving aggregation problems of Greek cultural and educational repositories in the framework of European. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 8(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2013.056602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2013.056602

Ivwighreghweta, O. (2012). An investigation to the challenges of institutional repositories development in six academic institutions in Nigeria. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 2(4), 1–16.

Jabbar, A., Saqib, U. R., & Muhammad, A. H. (2020). Accessibility and use of institutional repository among research scholars: A case of COMSATS institute of information technology, Lahore. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–18. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4259

Kakai, M., Musoke, M. G. N., & Okello-Obura, C. (2018). Open access institutional repositories in universities in East Africa. Information and Learning Sciences, 119(11), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-07-2018-0066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-07-2018-0066

Khaire, R., Dixit, N., Ghuge, A., Bhutada, D., Kasisomayajula, S. R., & Dhaigude, R. (2025). Implementation blues for the special Indian legislation to curb plagiarism in research in higher educational institutions. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 5. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.215

Kumar, A., Brar, V., Chaudhari, C., Raibagkar, S. S. (2025). Discrimination against private-school students under a special quota for the underprivileged: A case in India. Asia Pacific Education Review, 26, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09815-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09815-z

Kumar, E. S., & Balasubramanian, P. (2019). Torrential impact of discursive digitalized repositories in the university libraries of Tamil Nadu–Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–12.

Lihitkar, S. R., Lihitkar, R. S., & Agashe, A. T. (2009). A study of major repositories in India. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41212454

Lurie, N. H., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2009). Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.05.005

Makori, E. O., Njiraine, D., & Talam, P. (2015). Practical aspects of implementation of institutional repositories in Africa with reference to the University of Nairobi. New Library World, 116(9/10), 610–640. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-10-2014-0125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-10-2014-0125

Mannheimer, S., Pienta, A., Kirilova, D., Elman, C., & Wutich, A. (2019). Qualitative data sharing: Data repositories and academic libraries as key partners in addressing challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(5), 643–664. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002764218784991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218784991

Mncube, L. S., & Mthethwa, L. C. (2022). Potential ethical problems in the creation of open educational resources through virtual spaces in academia. Heliyon, 8(6). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(22)00911-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09623

Novak, J., & Day, A. (2018). The IR has two faces: Positioning institutional repositories for success. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2018.1425887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2018.1425887

Orduña-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2015). The dark side of open access in Google and Google Scholar: The case of Latin-American repositories. Scientometrics, 102, 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1369-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1369-5

Rodriguez, D., Herraiz, I., & Harrison, R. (2012). On software engineering repositories and their open problems. In 2012 First International Workshop on Realizing AI Synergies in Software Engineering (RAISE) (pp. 52–56). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/RAISE.2012.6227971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RAISE.2012.6227971

Rousidis, D., Garoufallou, E., Balatsoukas, P., & Sicilia, M. A. (2014). Metadata for Big Data: A preliminary investigation of metadata quality issues in research data repositories. Information Services & Use, 34(3–4), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-140746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-140746

Saini, O. P. (2018). The emergence of institutional repositories: A conceptual understanding of key issues through review of literature. Library Philosophy & Practice. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac

Sanfilippo, D., & Valle, A. (2013). Feedback systems: An analytical framework. Computer Music Journal, 37(2), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00176

Shodhganga. (2025a). Shodhganga: A reservoir of Indian theses @ INFLIBNET. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/

Shodhganga. (2025b). Shodhganga community list. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/community-list

Shodhganga. (2025c). Shodhganga MoU. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/newmoredetails/mou.html

Shonhe, L. (2017). A literature review of information dissemination techniques in the 21st century era. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Article 1731. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/189477592.pdf

Siddiqui, T., & Ahmad, A. (2017). Data mining tools and techniques for mining software repositories: A systematic review. Big Data Analytics, 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6620-7_70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6620-7_70

Singh, M., Paliwal, J., Rao, M. K., & Raibagkar, S. (2024). Impact of goal congruence on higher education institutions’ performance quality. Quality Assurance in Education, 32(3), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2023-0215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2023-0215

Singh, S. (2017). Electronic thesis and dissertation (ETD) repositories: A case study of Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana. In ETD2017 symposium.

Song, F., Parekh, S., Hooper, L., Loke, Y. K., Ryder, J., Sutton, A. J., Hing, C., Kwok, C. S., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010). Dissemination and publication of research findings: An updated review of related biases. Health Technology Assessment, 14(8), 1–220. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14080

Swanepoel, M., & Scott, D. R. (2018). Canadian and South African scholars’ use of institutional repositories, ResearchGate, and Academia.edu. Partnership. The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 13(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v13i1.4137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v13i1.4137

Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024

Tapfuma, M., & Hoskins, R. (2020). Visibility and accessibility of indigenous knowledge on open access institutional repositories at universities in Africa. In Digital Libraries and Institutional Repositories: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 454–472). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2463-3.ch028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2463-3.ch028

The Hindu. (2019). UGC to review quality of PhD theses over 10 years. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ugc-to-review-quality-of-phd-theses-over-10-years/article27277915.ece

Tripathi, A., Dabral, S., & Sureka, A. (2015). University-industry collaboration and open source software (OSS) dataset in mining software repositories (MSR) research. In 2015 IEEE 1st International Workshop on Software Analytics (SWAN) (pp. 39–40). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SWAN.2015.7070489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SWAN.2015.7070489

Truong, V., Denison, T., & Stracke, C. M. (2021). Developing institutional open educational resource repositories in Vietnam: Opportunities and challenges. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(4), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i1.5582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i1.5582

Turgut, Y. E., Aslan, A., & Denizalp, N. V. (2022). Academicians’ awareness, attitude, and use of open access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211016509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211016509

Ukwoma, S. C., & Ngulube, P. (2019). Obstacles to the utilization of institutional repositories by academics in higher education in Nigeria. Webology, 16(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V16I1/a183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V16I1/a183

Vásquez, C., Torres-Samuel, M., Viloria, A., Borrero, T. C., Varela, N., Lis-Gutiérrez, J. P., & Gaitán-Angulo, M. (2018). Visibility of research in universities: The triad product-researcher-institution. Case: Latin American Countries. In International conference on data mining and big data (pp. 225–234). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93803-5_21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93803-5_21

Westell, M. (2006). Institutional repositories: Proposed indicators of success. Library Hi Tech, 24(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610669583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610669583

Witten, I. H. (2005). Digital libraries and society: New perspectives on information and dissemination. In Design and usability of digital libraries: Case studies in the Asia Pacific (pp. 191–215). https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/digital-libraries-society/8139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-441-5.ch011

Zehra, T., Tariq, M., Motiwala, A., Ali, S. K., & Boulet, J. (2015). Challenges of providing timely feedback to residents: Faculty perspectives. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 65(10), 1069. https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_ded/23

Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Kumar, A. (2025). Why deemed and private universities are lagging in publishing their research online with India’s national repository?. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.233

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication

Section

Original article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Atul Kumar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0, which permits copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format, adapting, transforming, and building upon the material as long as the license terms are followed.