The digital footprint of academics in Karnataka: A study of research engagement and performance on ResearchGate

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.185

Keywords:

altmetrics, ResearchGate, academic social networking sites, research performance and evaluation, faculty engagement, citation analysis, citation impact, Karnataka universities

Abstract

Objective. This study explored the research engagement and performance of faculty members from selected universities in Karnataka, India, on ResearchGate (RG). The study assessed several metrics, including research contributions, forms of publications, and the availability of full-text documents. The objective was to identify the most productive universities, departments, and individual faculty members. Furthermore, the study undertook a multifaceted examination of the correlation between various RG metrics, with the objective of elucidating their interrelationship.

Methodology. A representative sample of universities in Karnataka was selected based on academic reputation and diversity. Data were collected from the profiles of 330 faculty members who had created RG profiles, including details on publications read, profile views, citations, H-index, participation in the question and answers (Q&A) section, research interest (RI) score, followers, and following. Subsequent correlation analyses were conducted to assess the relationship among these metrics.

Results. The study revealed that a mere 38.02% of faculty members across a selection of universities in Karnataka have established RG profiles. The University of Mysore demonstrated the highest level of research productivity, with 5,235 publications and 71,814 citations. Among the faculty members, K. R. Kini from the University of Mysore exhibited the highest RI score (7,712), followed by Gireesha B. J. from Kuvempu University, who attained an RI score of 5,261. The Department of Chemistry at Karnatak University demonstrated the highest level of productivity, with a total of 1,004 documents and an RI score of 8268.3. Statistical analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between university age and the number of RG profiles, as well as between the number of publications and citations. However, the correlation between the number of publications and the RI score was moderate and not statistically significant.

Conclusion. This study underscored the growing role of academic social networking platforms in scholarly communication. By identifying key trends in research visibility and engagement, the study provided valuable insights for researchers seeking to optimize their RG presence. While the study identified correlations among various RG metrics, its reliance on publicly available profile data, which may be subject to updates and inconsistencies, was a limitation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M. Y. (2021). Pakistani LIS faculty research performance on ResearchGate. International Conference of University Librarians Association (ICULA), Sri Lanka.

Ali, M. Y., & Richardson, J. (2017). Pakistani LIS scholars’ altmetrics in ResearchGate. Program, 51(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/prog-07-2016-0052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-07-2016-0052

Blümel, C. (2021). Academic social networks and bibliometrics. In B. Rafael (Ed.), Handbook bibliometrics (pp. 255–264). De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110646610-026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110646610-026

Césars, J., Alexis, M., & Emmanuel, E. (2021). Use of altmetric and bibliometric indicators to measure scientific productivity in the fields of life and earth sciences: Case study from Haiti. European Scientific Journal, 17(21), 316. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2021. v17n21p316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2021.v17n21p316

Goodyear, R. K., Brewer, D. J., Gallagher, K. S., Tracey, T. J., Claiborn, C. D., Lichtenberg, J. W., & Wampold, B. E. (2009). The intellectual foundations of education: Core journals and their impacts on scholarship and practice. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 700–706. https://doi. org/10.3102/0013189x09354778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09354778

Guédon, J. C. (2001). In Oldenburg’s long shadow: Librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing. Association of Research Libraries.

Kronick, D. A. (2001). The commerce of letters: Networks and “invisible colleges” in seventeenth-and eighteenth-century Europe. The Library Quarterly, 71(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1086/603239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/603239

Kumar, V., & Singh, J. (2021). Scholarly publishing patterns of medical academics: A case study of ResearchGate profile of King George’s Medical University, Lucknow. Library Philosophy and Practice, 5403, 1–15.

Meishar-Tal, H., & Pieterse, E. (2017). Why do academics use academic social networking sites? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2643

Panda, S., & Kaur, N. (2023). Research performance of top cited Indian researchers on ResearchGate platform: An altmetric analysis. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 60(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2023/v60i4/168065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2023/v60i4/168065

Piwowar, H., & Priem, J. (2013). The power of altmetrics on a CV. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 10–13. https://doi. org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390405

ResearchGate. (2023). About us. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/about

Sheeja, N. K., & Mathew, S. K. (2019). ResearchGate profiles of naval architecture scientists in India: An altmetric analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2305, 1–10.

Shrivastava, R., & Mahajan, P. (2017). An altmetric analysis of ResearchGate profiles of physics researchers: A study of University of Delhi (India). Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-07-2016-0033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-07-2016-0033

Singson, M., & Amees, M. (2017). Use of ResearchGate by the research scholars of Pondicherry University: A study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 37(5), 366. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.37.11139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.37.5.11139

Sulakshana, H. V., & Sampath Kumar, B. T. (2023). Use of ResearchGate by academics: A case study of the University of Mysore. In User-Centric Library Systems and Services: Trends and Challenges (pp. 156–160). University of Mysore.

Sulakshana, H. V., Sampath Kumar, B. T., & Basavaraja, M. T. (2022). Use of ResearchGate as digital repository by faculty members: An altmetric analysis. In Library Professionals Association & Tumkur University (Eds.), International conference on knowledge organization in academic libraries (pp. 238–247). D.P.S Publishing House.

Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature News, 512(7513), 126. https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a

Vinay, R. S., Sampath Kumar, B. T., & Shiva Kumara, S. U. (2020). RG score of science academics: An ideal tool to measure the research productivity. Library Philosophy and Practice. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4796/

Wildgaard, L. (2014). Just pimping the CV? The feasibility of ready-to-use bibliometric indicators to enrich curriculum vitae. In iConference 2014 Proceedings (pp. 954–958). https://doi.org/10.9776/14326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9776/14326

Downloads

Published

2025-04-14

How to Cite

Sulakshana, H. V., & Sampath Kumar, B. T. (2025). The digital footprint of academics in Karnataka: A study of research engagement and performance on ResearchGate. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 5(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.185

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): In Progress

Section

Original article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 H V Sulakshana, B. T. Sampath Kumar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0, which permits copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format, adapting, transforming, and building upon the material as long as the license terms are followed.