Influence and collaboration in library and information science research: A university perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.153

Keywords:

bibliometrics, library and information science, librarianship, university, social network analysis, scientific production

Abstract

Objective. The objective of this study was to examine the influence and collaboration patterns within library and information science (LIS) research, with a particular focus on the contributions of universities over time.

Design/Methodology/Approach. This study used bibliometrics and LIS network analysis to examine 14,517 articles indexed in Scopus from 1954 to 2023. The Bibliometrix R-package was used to identify publication trends, influential institutions, authors, and collaboration networks in the LIS field. 

Findings. The key findings indicated that Wuhan University was the foremost institution in LIS research, with notable contributions from Chinese scholars who were identified as the most influential authors in the field. The keywords “information science” and “information retrieval” emerged as common thematic areas, reflecting core research interests. The content analysis also revealed that LIS research had robust connections with fields such as physics, computer science, and information technology, underscoring an interdisciplinary trend.

Originality/Value. This study offered original insights into the evolving landscape of LIS research, identifying both leadership in academic output and potential gaps in current research coverage. It underscored the necessity for future research to expand the scope of its database and refine keyword selection for more comprehensive representation. The findings contributed to the strategic development of LIS research and the fostering of international collaboration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abubakara, B. M. (2021). Library and information science (LIS) education in Nigeria: Emerging trends, challenges, and expectations in the digital age. Journal of Balkan Libraries Union, 8(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.16918/jblu.932134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16918/jblu.932134

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3250921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317

Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018

Eisert, J., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2010). Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(1), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277

Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3

Garfield, E., & Sher Irving, I. H. (1993). KeyWords Plus™—Algorithmic derivative indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, 44(5), 298–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199306)44:5%3C298::AID-ASI5%3E3.0.CO;2-A DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199306)44:5<298::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-A

Garg, K. C., & Singh, R. K. (2022). A bibliometric study of papers published in library and information science research during 1994-2020. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 42(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.42.1.17480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.42.1.17480

Gupta, N., & Chakravarty, R. (2022). Deciphering the status of library and information science research in BRICS nations: A research visualization approach. Journal of Library Administration, 62(3), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2043695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2043695

Hjørland, B. (2013). Citation analysis: Asocial and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing Management, 49(6), 1313–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001

Hjørland, B. (2018). Library and information science (LIS), Part 1. Knowledge Organization, 45(3), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-3-232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-3-232

Hou, L., Luo, J., & Pan, X. (2022). Research topic specialization of universities in information science and library science and its impact on inter-university collaboration. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(15), 9000. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159000

Islam, M. A., & Roy, P. K. (2021). Bibliometric study of scholarly productivity of library and information science research in Bangladesh from 1971-2020. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 41(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.03.16854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.03.16854

Islam, M. S., Islam, M. N., & Mondal, M. (2018). Research trends in library and information science in Bangladesh: An analytical study. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 6(2), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2018.6.2.3

Jabeen, M., Yun, L., Rafiq, M., & Jabeen, M. (2015). Research productivity of library scholars bibliometric analysis of growth and trends of LIS publications. New Library World, 116(7–8), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2014-0132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2014-0132

Jabeen, M., Yun, L., Rafiq, M., Jabeen, M., & Tahir, M. A. (2015). Scientometric analysis of library and information science journals 2003–2012 using web of science. International Information and Library Review, 47(3–4), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2015.1113602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2015.1113602

Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (2022). LIS research across 50 years: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2021-0062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2021-0062

Juznic, P., & Urbanija, J. (2003). Developing research skills in library and information science studies. Library Management, 24(6/7), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120310486048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120310486048

Kennan, M., Corrall, S., & Afzal, W. (2014). Making space in practice and education: Research support services in academic libraries. Library Management, 35(8/9), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-03-2014-0037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-03-2014-0037

Lazar, N., & Chithra, K. (2021). Comprehensive bibliometric mapping of publication trends in the development of building sustainability assessment systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 4899–4923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00796-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00796-w

Middleton, A. (2005). An attempt to quantify the quality of student bibliographies. Performance measurement and metrics. The International Journal for Library and Information Services, 6(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/0.1108/14678040510588553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040510588553

Naseer, M. M., & Mahmood, K. (2009a). Use of bibliometrics in LIS research. Libres, 19(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32655/LIBRES.2009.2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32655/LIBRES.2009.2.4

Naseer, M. M., & Mahmood, K. (2009b). LIS research in Pakistan: An analysis of Pakistan Library and Information Science Journal 1998-2007. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal, 40(3), 10–20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/275

Philip Chen, C. L., & Zhang, C.-Y. (2014). Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big Data. Information Sciences, 275, 314–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015

Piwowar-Sulej, K., Krzywonos, M., & Kwil, I. (2021). Environmental entrepreneurship—Bibliometric and content analysis of the subject literature based on H-Core. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, Article 126277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126277

Prabpala, S., & Nitiwatthana, K. (2024). Enhancing learning style identification through advanced machine learning techniques text analytics of models and applications in personalized education. Sociolytics Journal, 1(1), 21–32.

Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., & Blettner, M. (1989). Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.24528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/21.24528

Sa, M. K., & Dora, M. (2019). Research productivity and research trends in the library and information science subject: A study with reference to SCOPUS. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2019, 2661. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2661/

Sahu, R. R., & Parabhoi, L. (2020). Bibliometric study of library and information science journal articles during 2014-2018: LIS research trends in India. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 40(6), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.6.15631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.06.15631

Salton, G., Wong, A., & Yang, C. S. (1975). A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/361219.361220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/361219.361220

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

Siddique, N., Ur Rehman, S., Ahmad, S., Abbas, A., & Khan, M. A. (2023). Library and information science research in the Arab World: A bibliometric analysis 1951–2021. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 72(1–2), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2021-0103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2021-0103

Tan, J., Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1473–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1125-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1125-2

Tripathi, M., Jeevan, V. K. J., Babbar, P., & Mahemei, L. K. (2018). Library and information science research in BRICS countries. Information and Learning Science, 119(3–4), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2017-0101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2017-0101

Vidal, G., Latorre, J. I., Rico, E., & Kitaev, A. (2003). Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena. Physical Review Letters, 90(22), 2279021–2279024. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.227902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.227902

Wahyuningrum, I. F. S., Humaira, N. G., Budihardjo, M. A., Arumdani, I. S., Annisa, A. N., Puspita, A. S., Sari, A. M., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2023). Environmental sustainability disclosure in Asian countries: Bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 411, 137195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137195

Zhong, M., & Lin, M. (2022). Bibliometric analysis for economy in COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(2022), Article e10757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10757

Downloads

Published

2024-11-03

How to Cite

Wattanasiri, P., Manorom, P., & Chansanam, W. (2024). Influence and collaboration in library and information science research: A university perspective. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 4(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.153

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication

Section

Original article

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Pornnisa Wattanasiri, Paiboon Manorom, Wirapong Chansanam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0, which permits copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format, adapting, transforming, and building upon the material as long as the license terms are followed.