Practice-based research in the Social Sciences & Humanities: A bibliometric analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.134

Keywords:

practice-based research, practitioner research, bibliometric analysis, word co-occurrence network analysis, Social Sciences and Humanities

Abstract

Practice-based research (PBR) has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional models of academia–practice collaborations, aiming to integrate scientific inquiry with practical interventions. However, the lack of a comprehensive, cross-disciplinary understanding of PBR has obstructed its recognition and led to inadequate evaluation frameworks. To address this gap, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis across the Social Sciences and Humanities disciplines to explore trends in PBR adoption and publication. Analyzing 3,417 documents from the Web of Science, it examined PBR research trends and utilized bibliometric mapping to identify thematic research clusters and historical evolution patterns. The findings revealed a growing interest in PBR, likely influenced by a focus on societal impact and educational reforms, such as the integration of vocational education into academic structures. It emphasized the need for cross-disciplinary exploration of PBR, shedding light on its diverse approaches and providing a systematic, data-driven perspective beyond theoretical frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ammerman, A., Smith, T. W., & Calancie, L. (2014). Practice-based evidence in public health: Improving reach, relevance, and results. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182458

Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12–21, 40. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028005012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028005012

Archambault, É., Vignola-Gagné, É., Côté, G., Larivière, V., & Gingrasb, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the Social Sciences and Humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z

Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1181–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314529160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314529160

Candy, L. (2006). Practice based research: A guide. CCS Report: 2006-V1.0 November. University of Technology Sydney.

Chan, T. M., Dzara, K., Dimeo, S. P., Bhalerao, A., & Maggio, L. A. (2020). Social media in knowledge translation and education for physicians and trainees: A scoping review. Perspectives on Medical Education, 9, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-019-00542-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-019-00542-7

Chesak, S. S., Rhudy, L. M., Tofthagen, C., & Chlan, L. L. (2022). A practice-based model to guide nursing science and improve the health and well-being of patients and caregivers. Journal of clinical nursing, 31(3-4), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15837

Dodd, S. J., & Epstein, I. (2012). Practice-based research in social work: A guide for reluctant researchers. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155639

Ek, A.-C., Ideland, M., Jonsson, S., & Malmberg, C. (2013). The tension between marketisation and academisation in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1305–1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.619656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.619656

Erwin, P. C., & Brownson, R. C. (2017). Macro trends and the future of public health practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044224

Farley-Ripple, E., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018). Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042

Flickinger, M., Tuschke, A., Gruber-Muecke, T., & Fiedler, M. (2014). In search of rigor, relevance, and legitimacy: What drives the impact of publications? Journal of Business Economics, 84, 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0692-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0692-2

Fox, N. J. (2003). Practice-based evidence: Towards collaborative and transgressive research. Sociology, 37(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038503037001388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038503037001388

Georgii-Hemming, E., Johansson, K., & Moberg, N. (2020). Reflection in higher music education: What, why, wherefore? Music Education Research, 22(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2020.1766006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2020.1766006

Green, L. W. (2008). Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Family Practice, 25(Suppl 1), i20–i24. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn055

Grinnel, R. M., & Unrau, Y. A. (2014). Social work research and evaluation: Foundations of evidence-based practice. Oxford University Press.

Guerrero-Hernández, G. R., & Fernández-Ugalde, R. A. (2020). Teachers as researchers: Reflecting on the challenges of research–practice partnerships between school and university in Chile. London Review of Education, 18(3), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.3.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.3.07

Heikkinen, H. L., De Jong, F. P. C. M., & Vanderlinde, R. (2016). What is (good) practitioner research? Vocations and Learning, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9153-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9153-8

Heissenberger, K., & Matischek-Jauk, M. (2020). “It’s worth it”: Practitioner research as a tool of professional learning: Starting points, conclusions and benefits from the perspective of teacher-students. Educational Action Research, 28(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1627890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1627890

Jensen, E. A., Wong, P., & Reed, M. S. (2022). How research data deliver non-academic impacts: A secondary analysis of UK Research Excellence Framework impact case studies. PLoS ONE, 17(3), Article e0264914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264914

Joyce, K. E., & Cartwright, N. (2020). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Predicting what will work locally. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 1045–1082. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219866687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219866687

Kelly, E. L., Davis, L., Holguin, M., Gaona, L., Pahwa, R., Lee, S., Pancake, L., Murch, L., Giambone, L., & Brekke, J. S. (2020). Practice-based research networks in stakeholder-driven social work research. Research on Social Work Practice, 30, 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973152094259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731520942591

Lewandowska, K., & Kulczycki, E. (2022). Academic research evaluation in artistic disciplines: The case of Poland. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1893651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1893651

Lewandowska, K., Kulczycki, E., & Ochsner, M. (2023). Evaluation of the arts in performance-based research funding systems: An international perspective. Research Evaluation, 32(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac017

Lewandowska, K., Ochsner, M., & Kulczycki, E. (2024). Research quality criteria in the creative arts. Studies in Higher Education, 49(4), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2248174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2248174

Leydesdorff, L., & Salah, A. A. (2011). Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus “Digital Humanities” as a topic. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21303

Li, J., Goerlandt, F., & Reniers, G. (2021). An overview of scientometric mapping for the safety science community: Methods, tools, and framework. Safety Science, 134, Article 105093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105093

Martínez, M. A., Cobo, M. J., Herrera, M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973151452210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514522101

Muhonen, R., Benneworth, P., & Olmos-Peñuela, J. (2020). From productive interactions to impact pathways: Understanding the key dimensions in developing SSH research societal impact. Research Evaluation, 29(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz003

Negt, P., & Haunschild, A. (2024). Exploring the gap between research and practice in human resource management (HRM): A scoping review and agenda for future research. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00397-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00397-7

Nelson, J. P., Bozeman, B., Bretschneider, S., & Lindsay, S. L. (2024). How do academic public administration and public policy researchers affect policymaking? Functional groupings from survey data. Scientometrics, 129, 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04860-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04860-w

Nelson, R. (2022). Practice as research in the arts (and beyond): Principles, processes, contexts, achievements. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90542-2

Oancea, A., & Furlong, J. (2007). Expressions of excellence and the assessment of applied and practice-based research. Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296056

Ochsner, M., & Bulaitis, Z. (Eds.). (2023). Accountability in academic life: European perspectives on societal impact evaluation. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800885738

Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., & Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2

Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., van der Steen, J., & Nijveldt, M. (2014). A study of the quality of practitioner research in secondary education: Impact on teacher and school development. Educational Action Research, 22(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.854175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.854175

Pan, S. L., & Pee, L. G. (2020). Usable, in-use, and useful research: A 3U framework for demonstrating practice impact. Information Systems Journal, 30(2), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12274

Raynaud, M., Goutaudier, V., Louis, K., Al-Awadhi, S., Dubourg, Q., Truchot, A., Brousse, R., Saleh, N., Giarraputo, A., Debiais, C., Demir, Z., Certain, A., Tacafred, F., Cortes-Garcia, E., Yanes, S., Dagobert, J., Naser, S., Robin, B., Élodi, B., … Loupy, A. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on publication dynamics and non-COVID-19 research production. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21, 255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01404-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01404-9

Schauz, D. (2014). What is basic research? Insights from historical semantics. Minerva, 52(3), 273–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9255-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9255-0

Shaw, I., & Lunt, N. (2018). Forms of practitioner research. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx024

Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85, 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0236-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0236-2

Simons, H., Kushner, S., Jones, K., & James, D. (2003). From evidence‐based practice to practice‐based evidence: the idea of situated generalisation. Research Papers in Education, 18(4), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176855

Traag, V. A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports, 9, 5233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z

Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. (2019). VOSviewer manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.11. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.11.pdf

Vanlee, F., & Ysebaert, W. (2019). Disclosing and evaluating artistic research. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0014

Willemse, T. M., Boei, F., & Pillen, M. (2016). Fostering teacher educators’ professional development on practice-based research through communities of inquiry. Vocations and Learning, 9, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9142-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9142-3

Wilson, J. (2016). The white cube in the black box: Assessing artistic research quality in multidisciplinary academic panels. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1223–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1075190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1075190

Wyse, D., Brown, C., Oliver, S., & Poblete, X. (2021). Education research and educational practice: The qualities of a close relationship. British Educational Research Journal, 47(6), 1466–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3626

Yair, G., Goldstein, K., Rotem, N., & Olejniczak, A. J. (2022). The three cultures in American science: Publication productivity in physics, history and economics. Scientometrics, 127, 2967–2980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04396-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04396-5

Zang, D., & Liu, C. (2023). Exploring the clinical translation intensity of papers published by the world’s top scientists in basic medicine. Scientometrics, 128, 2371–2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04634-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04634-4

Zheng, H., Pee, L. G., & Zhang, D. (2021). Societal impact of research: A text mining study of impact types. Scientometrics, 126, 7397–7417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04096-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04096-6

Downloads

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Lewandowska, K. (2024). Practice-based research in the Social Sciences & Humanities: A bibliometric analysis. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 4(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.134

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication

Section

Original article

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Kamila Lewandowska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0, which permits copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format, adapting, transforming, and building upon the material as long as the license terms are followed.

Funding data